|
THE
MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND INVESTMENT
-------
|
SOCIALIST
REPUBLIC OF VIET NAM
Independence - Freedom - Happiness
----------
|
|
No:
04/2000/TT-BKH
|
Hanoi,
May 26, 2000
|
CIRCULAR
GUIDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BIDDING REGULATION
Pursuant to the Bidding Regulation issued
together with the Government’s Decree No.88/1999/ND-CP of September 1st, 1999
(called Decree No. 88/CP for short) and Decree No. 14/2000/ND-CP of May 5, 2000
(called Decree No. 14/CP for short), the Ministry of Planning and Investment
hereby guides the implementation of a number of major contents of the Bidding
Regulation as follows:
Part One
A NUMBER OF GENERAL ISSUES
Chapter I
APPLICATION OBJECTS
The objects of application of the Bidding
Regulation are defined in Clause 2, Article 2 of the Bidding Regulation,
concretely as follows:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The investment projects implemented under the
Regulation on Investment and Construction Management and prescribed at Point a,
Clause 2, Article 2 of the Bidding Regulation are projects which use the State
budget capital, State-guaranteed credit capital, the State’s development
investment credit capital and/or development investment capital of the State enterprises,
including:
1. Investment projects for new construction,
renovation, overhaul, upgrading of projects already invested and constructed;
2. Investment projects for procurement of assets
including equipment, machinery which require no installation and new
technological and scientific products;
3. Projects using State budget capital for
regional and territorial development planning, branch development planning, or
urban and rural construction planning.
Section II. PROJECTS WHICH REQUIRE THE
SELECTION OF INVESTMENT PARTNERS FOR IMPLEMENTATION
The projects which require the selection of
investment partners for implementation are defined at Point d, Clause 2,
Article 2 of the Bidding Regulation when 2 or more investors wish to
participate therein, including:
1. Joint-venture projects;
2. Projects to be executed in form of business
cooperation contracts;
3. Projects with 100% foreign capital;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
5. Other projects which require the selection of
investment partners.
Chapter II
PRELIMINARY SELECTION OF
BIDDERS
The preliminary selection of bidders is
stipulated in Article 23 and Article 34 of the Bidding Regulation, concretely
as follows:
Section I. GENERAL PROVISIONS ON PRELIMINARY
SELECTION
1. Bidding packages valued at 300 plus billion
VND for goods procurement and at 200 plus billion VND for construction and
installation must all go through the preliminary selection. Depending on the
nature of each bidding package, for bidding packages with value below the
above-prescribed levels, the preliminary selection may also be organized on the
basis of decisions made by competent persons in the approved bidding plans.
2. For goods procurement or construction and
installation bidding packages without going through the preliminary selection,
the bidding dossiers must clearly state the request that bidders fully submit
the documents on capabilities prescribed at Point b, Clause 2, Article 9 of the
Bidding Regulation and declare their capabilities and experience according to
questionaire forms 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 at Section II of the Preliminary
Selection Dossiers, Appendix III to this Circular.
3. The preliminary selection time lasting from
the time of distributing the preliminary selection invitation dossiers till the
time of announcing the results shall not exceed 90 days for the international
bidding, or 60 days for the domestic bidding. The shortening of preliminary
selection duration is encouraged.
Section II. PRELIMINARY SELECTION INVITATION
DOSSIERS
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Section III. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF
PRELIMINARY SELECTION PARTICIPATION DOSSIERS
The evaluation of preliminary selection
participation dossiers shall be carried out on the basis of points giving
according to 3 criteria with the following major contents:
1. Technical capability (accounting for 20-30%
of the total points), including:
a) The major business products;
b) The quantity and qualifications of
professional cadres;
c) Personnel projection and site organization;
d) Projection on subcontractors;
e) The capability to deploy equipment for
implementation of bidding packages;
f) The capability to enter partnership and to
use Vietnamese subcontractors.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
a) Turnover for 3 to 5 latest years (depending
on each bidding package);
b) Total assets, working capital, before- and
after-tax profits in 3 to 5 latest years (depending on each bidding package);
c) Value of contractual parts being performed
and not yet completed;
d) The bidder�s
credit capability and addresses of banks which supply credits to the bidder.
3. Experience (accounting for about 30-40% of
the total points), including:
a) The number of years with working experiences;
b) The quantity of contracts with value being
equal to 50% or higher of the bidding package being under preliminary
selection, which have been performed within 3 to 5 latest years;
c) The quantity of contracts already performed
in the world, the region and in Vietnam within 3 to 5 latest years, which are
similar to the bidding package being under preliminary selection.
For goods procurement bidding packages,
depending on the nature of each bidding package, the temporal requirements
stated at Points a and b of Clause 2 and Points b and c of Clause 3 of this
Section may be less than 3 years if it suits the practical situation of the
project and is approved by the competent person or the competent level.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Section IV. EVALUATION OF PRELIMINARY
SELECTION PARTICIPATION DOSSIERS
The evaluation of preliminary selection
participation dossiers shall be made by the bid solicitors or hired experts. A
preliminary selection participation dossier is evaluated as having met the
preliminary selection requirements when it scores at least 60% of the total
points and each criteria on technical capability, financial capability or
experience is given 50% or more of the maximum points for such criteria.
Chapter III
OTHER ISSUES
Section I. CONDITIONS FOR PARTICIPATION IN
BIDDINGS
1. Where a corporation registers its name for
the bidding, as stipulated at Point c, Clause 2, Article 9 of the Bidding
Regulation, all its attached units with dependent cost- accounting shall not be
allowed to participate therein in the capacity as independent bidders for the
same bidding package in form of principal contractor (in partnership or
unilateral).
2. Foreign bidders participating in biddings in
Vietnam shall have to commit to procure and use supplies and equipment with
suitable quality and prices, which are being manufactured, processed or
available in Vietnam as provided for at Clause 4, Article 10 of the Bidding
Regulation; if they are not available or can not be manufactured or processed
in the country, the bidders may offer the imports from overseas on the basis of
ensuring their quality and reasonable prices.
Section II. APPOINTED BIDDING
Other special bidding packages, to which the
form of appointed bidding stipulated at Point d, Clause 3, Article 4 of the
Bidding Regulation shall be applied at the requests of the capital-supplying
agencies or due to their technical and technological complexities or to
unexpected requirements of the projects, are those valued at 1 plus billion VND
for goods procurement or construction and installation, or at 500 plus million
VND for consultancy (excluding consultancy on elaboration of pre-feasibility or
feasibility study reports) under projects of Groups A, B and C or the
equivalent, and the appointment of bidders shall be decided by the persons
competent to decide the investment, based on the evaluation reports of the
Ministry of Planning and Investment and the written comments of the capital
supplying agencies as well as other relevant bodies. For these bidding
packages, if they belong to projects of Group A or the equivalent, the
appointment of bidders shall be decided by the Prime Minister on the basis of
the evaluation by the Ministry of Planning and Investment and written comments
of the capital-supplying agencies and other relevant bodies, without dividing
the responsibility therefor like for the bidding packages mentioned at Point c,
Clause 3, Article 4 of the Bidding Regulation.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Section III. BID INVITATION
Bid invitation shall be carried out through the
announcement of bid solicitation or sending of bid invitation letters as provided
for in Clause 2 of Article 20, Clause 3 of Article 22, Clause 3 of Article 33,
Point b, Clause 1 of Article 45 and Clause 2 of Article 47, of the Bidding
Regulation, including:
1. Bid invitation announcement
The bid invitation announcement shall apply in
case of unrestricted bidding. The notice form is prescribed in Appendices I, II
and III to this Circular.
The bid solicitor must make the announcement on
the mass media, including daily newspapers, audio-visual means and/or other
means, depending on the size and nature of the bidding packages, for at least 3
consecutive issues and the announcement must be made at least 5 days before the
distribution of bidding dossiers, for small-sized bidding packages, or 10 days
for other bidding packages after the first announcement.
In case of international biddings, the bid
solicitors shall have to make such announcement according to the regulations in
this Clause and at least on one English-language newspaper circulated widely in
Vietnam or according to the donors’ regulations.
2. Sending of bid invitation letters
The sending of bid invitation letters shall
apply to bidding packages under the restricted bidding, the bidding packages
already gone through preliminary selection and the bidding packages selected through
shortlists. The bid solicitors should send the bid invitation letters through
fax, postal service or other means directly to the bidders on the list already
approved by the competent persons or the competent authorities. The duration
from the time of sending bid invitation letters to the time of distributing the
bidding dossiers shall be at least 7 days for the international bidding and 5
days for the domestic bidding, 3 days for small bidding packages. The form of
bid invitation letter for each specific domain is prescribed in Appendices I,
II and III to this Circular.
Section IV. BID PREPARATION TIME
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Section V. RECEIPT OF BIDS
The receipt of bids stipulated in Clause 5 of
Article 20, Clause 4 of Article 22, Clause 4 of Article 33, Point c, Clause 1
of Article 45, Clause 3 of Article 47 of the Bidding Regulation shall be
implemented as follows:
1. The bid solicitor shall receive bids
submitted by bidders directly or by mail according to the addresses and time
prescribed in the bidding dossiers.
2. The bid solicitor shall not receive bids or
any supplementary documents, including price reduction letters, after the
bidding closure (except for documents clarifying bids at the request of the bid
solicitor as provided for in Article 11 of the Bidding Regulation). Bids
submitted after the bidding closure are considered invalid and shall be
returned to bidders in status quo.
3. When wishing to amend or withdraw their
already submitted bids, bidders must send their written requests for the
amendment or withdrawal of their bids, which must be received by the bid
solicitors before the bidding closure time stated in the bidding dossiers.
Section VI. BID OPENING
The bid opening is stipulated in Clause 1,
Article 13 of the Bidding Regulation, including:
1. Bid opening preparation
The bid solicitor shall invite representative of
each bidder and may invite representatives of concerned management bodies to
attend and witness the bid opening. The bid opening shall be conducted at
places and time inscribed in the bidding dossiers, without depending on the
presence or absence of the invited bidders.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
a) Announcement of participants.
b) Announcement of the quantity and names of
bidders who have submitted bids.
c) Checking the seals of bids.
d) Opening bid bags one by one, reading and
recording the following vital information:
- The names of bidders;
- The quantity of originals and copies of bids;
- The bid prices, including price reduction;
- Bid guarantee, if any;
- Other matters.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
f) Signing the bid-opening minutes for
certification by the representative of the bid solicitor, the representatives
of bidders and the representatives of concerned management bodies (if any).
g) Signing the originals of bids for
certification by the experts’ team or the bid solicitor before making evaluation
according to the provisions in Clause 1, Article 13 of the Bidding Regulation.
The bids’ originals shall be preserved under the confidentiality regime and the
evaluation shall be made upon their copies.
Section VII. SHORT LIST
The short list of bidders is prescribed in
Clause 21, Article 3 of the Bidding Regulation, including:
1. The short list for consultancy bidding
packages is the list of bidders invited to participate in the consultancy
biddings, comprising at least 5 bidders. Where the number of bidders is not
enough, the bid solicitor shall report such to the competent person or
competent level for decision.
2. The short list for goods procurement or
construction and installation bidding packages is the list of bidders selected
through the step of technical evaluation, comprising all bidders who have got
the minimum number of technical points or more as provided for in the approved
evaluation criteria.
Section VIII. ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY
FOR BIDDING
The assignment of responsibility for bidding
provided for in Article 52 of the Bidding Regulation shall be effected as
follows:
1. The Management Boards (or persons authorized
by the Management Boards) of joint-venture enterprises (limited liability
companies), the lawful representatives of parties to the business cooperation
contracts, the Management Boards (or persons authorized by the Management
Boards) of shareholding enterprises (joint-stock companies) shall have the
following responsibilities for joint-venture, business cooperation contract or
shareholding projects under their respective management as defined at Point b,
Clause 2, Article 2 of the Bidding Regulation:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
b) To approve the basic contents of the bidding
process prescribed at Points b, c, d, e, f, g and i of Clause 1, Article 51 of
the Bidding Regulation.
2. The competent persons of State enterprises
have the responsibility to approve the basic contents of the bidding process
prescribed in Article 51 of the Bidding Regulation for projects falling under the
scope of their investment deciding powers.
Section IX. KEEPING SECRET DOSSIERS,
DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION IN THE BIDDING PROCESS
Dossiers, documents and information relating to
bidding packages throughout the bidding process are considered trade secrets
which must be kept confidential according to the Ordinance on Protection of
State Secrets. The keeping secret of dossiers, documents and information
throughout the bidding process provided for in Clause 1, Article 13 and Article
56 of the Bidding Regulation shall cover the following:
1. Individuals and collectives of the bid
solicitor, consultants for elaboration of bidding dossiers and bid-evaluating
and-approving bodies must not disclose the contents of bidding dossiers to any
subjects before the distribution of bidding dossiers;
2. The bid solicitor shall have to keep
confidential bids submitted by bidders. The bidders shall have to keep
confidential their own bids until the bidding results are announced.
Competitive offer bids sent by fax must also be kept secret like other bids;
3. Individuals and collectives of the bid
solicitor, of the experts or consultants’ team responsible for bid evaluation
must not disclose information relating to the bid-evaluating process such as
contents of bids, handbooks with records of and minutes of meetings on bid
evaluation, evaluation comments of experts or consultants on each bidders and
other relevant documents;
4. The mass media must not carry bid
evaluation-related information stated in Clause 3 of this Section during the
bid-evaluating process as from the time of bid opening till the time of
announcing the bidding results;
5. The bid solicitor, the agencies submitting
bidding results for approval, the bidding result-evaluating agencies and the
competent persons or competent levels shall have to keep secret the submitted
and approved dossiers on bidding results stated in Clause 2, Section I, Chapter
I, Part Five of this Circular and documents relating to reports on bidding
results evaluation by the evaluation agencies stated in Clause 3, Section II,
Chapter I, Part Five of this Circular.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
PROJECT BIDDING PLANS
Chapter I
ELABORATION OF BIDDING PLANS
Bidding plans shall be elaborated and submitted
for approval to serve as basis for carrying out the biddings. When the bidding
plans are elaborated, agencies, professional organizations or individuals, that
are knowledgeable about projects, should be employed. Depending on the work
characters and implementation time, the elaboration of bidding plans shall be
effected as follows:
Section I. ELABORATING BIDDING PLANS TOGETHER
WITH PROJECT INVESTMENT DECISIONS
For Group C projects, the project bidding plan
must be elaborated and approved simultaneously together with the feasibility
study report or the investment report and shall be reflected in the investment
decision (prescribed in Clause 11 of Article 24 and Clause 10 of Article 30 of
the Investment and Construction Management Regulation issued together with the
Government’s Decree No.52/1999/ND-CP of July 8, 1999 and Decree
No.12/2000/ND-CP of May 5, 2000). The project bidding plan must conform to the
contents of the approved feasibility study report or investment report and
conform to the Bidding Regulation.
Besides Group C projects, a number of other
projects, if fully qualified, may have their bidding plans elaborated and
submitted for approval together with the investment decisions, provided that
all requirements on bidding plan stated in Article 8 of the Bidding Regulation
must be satisfied.
Section II. ELABORATING BIDDING PLANS AFTER
THE PROJECT INVESTMENT DECISIONS ARE APPROVED
For the remaining projects, the elaboration and
approval of the project bidding plans shall be carried out after the investment
decisions are approved. In this case, the bases for elaboration of the project
bidding plans shall be the approved or effective documents such as:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
2. The investment decision;
3. The international treaties on financial
support, for projects using sources of international assistance;
4. Approved cost estimates, total cost estimates
(if any);
5. The capability of capital supply, practical
situation of the project;
6. Other relevant legal documents (if any).
Chapter II
CONTENTS OF THE PROJECT BIDDING PLANS
A bidding plan shall include contents of the
project’s work volume to be carried out according to the Bidding Regulation.
When elaborating the bidding plan, 6 contents prescribed in Clause 2, Article 8
of the Bidding Regulation should be fully ensured, concretely as follows:
Section I. BIDDING PACKAGE DIVISION
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
2. In special cases, a bidding package may also
be divided into different parts for implementation under one or many contracts,
which should be clearly defined in the bidding dossiers so that bidders may
make offers to one, many or all parts of the bidding package.
Section II. THE PRICES OF BIDDING PACKAGES
AND FINANCIAL SOURCES
The bidding packages’ prices shall be determined
on the basis of their conformity with the total investment structure in the
feasibility study report or the cost estimate or total cost estimate of the
project, which has been approved by the competent person or the competent
level. Each bidding package should be clearly determined in term of financial
source such as budget capital, State-guaranteed credit capital, development
investment credit capital of the State, development investment capital of
enterprises, capital arranged by the contractor or other capital sources.
Section III. FORMS OF SELECTING BIDDERS AND
BIDDING MODES
Depending on the work character of each bidding
package and the practical situation of the project, suitable form of selecting
the bidder and the bidding mode shall be determined. The bidding effected on
the basis of each bidding package means a bidding package shall have only one
bid and be open to bidding only once. Corresponding to each bidding package
there is only one form of selecting bidders and only one bidding mode.
Section IV. THE TIME FOR ORGANIZING BIDDING
FOR EACH BIDDING PACKAGE
The time for organizing bidding shall be counted
from the time of distributing the bidding dossiers to the time of announcing
the bidding results.
Section V. TYPES OF CONTRACT
Depending on the character and time of bidding
package performance, suitable types of contract shall be selected. Where a
bidding package is implemented under many contracts, such contracts may be
performed in the same or different types, depending on the requirements on the
contents and implementation time, but this must be clearly stated in the
bidding dossiers.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The contract performance duration projected for
each bidding package in the bidding plan must conform to the approved time-
table of the project and the feasibility of the implementation of the bidding
package.
Chapter III
SUBMISSION FOR APPROVAL, EVALUATION AND APPROVAL OF
PROJECT BIDDING PLANS
Section I. SUBMISSION OF BIDDING PLANS FOR
APPROVAL
1. Responsibility to submit bidding plans for
approval
The investors shall have the responsibility to
submit the project bidding plans to the competent persons for approval. For
Group A or equivalent projects, the bidding plans shall be submitted to the
Prime Minister by ministers, heads of ministerial-level agencies, heads of
agencies attached to the Government, Management Boards of State corporations
set up by the Prime Minister or presidents of the People’s Committees of the
provinces or centrally-run cities according to the Government’s Working
Regulations. Where the Management Boards of State corporations set up by the
Prime Minister (Corporations 91) submit the bidding plans to the Prime
Minister, the branch-managing ministries (if any) should send their written
comments to the Prime Minister, clearly stating the legal bases, the contents
and rationality of the bidding plans submitted by the above-said Management
Boards of the State corporations.
2. Dossiers for bidding plan submission for
approval
a) Documents for bidding plan submission for
approval
The document for bidding plan submission for
approval should reflect the following contents:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The already performed work volume shall include
bidding packages or work in service of investment preparation and investment
implementation preparation, which have been done as prescribed, such as
surveys, elaboration of pre-feasibility study reports and feasibility study
reports and a number of other jobs if any. For each bidding package or work
already performed, the name of execution unit, deciding level, performance
value, type of contract and execution duration should be clearly stated.
- The work volume not opened to bidding:
This part include jobs which cannot be opened to
bidding such as the expenses for the project management board, expenses for
compensation, the rent of land use right, final settlement of the project,
expenses for test run, payable fee amounts, loan interests during the
construction, initial working capital in preparation for production, amounts of
contributed capital reflected in kind, labor of organizations and/or
individuals participating in the project prescribed in the investment decision,
reserve funds and other expenses if any.
- Work volume to be opened to bidding (the
project bidding plan):
This include the remaining work of the project,
for which bidding should be organized, including bomb and mine sweeping,
construction of resettlement quarters. The grounds for bidding package
division, the grounds for application of form of selecting bidders, bidding
mode and type of contract for each bidding package should be clearly explained.
The total value of the work volume already performed,
not opened to bidding and to be opened to bidding must be compatible to and not
exceed the total investment approved for the project.
b) Materials enclosed with the documents
submitted for approval:
Upon the submission of the project bidding plans
for approval, in addition to the documents submitted for approval, the copies
of the following materials shall also be sent:
- The approved feasibility study report and
explanation documents, if any, supplemented during the process of project
evaluation;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
- The international agreement on financial
support for projects using international financial support;
- The approved cost estimate, total cost
estimate, if any;
- Other relevant legal documents.
Section II. EVALUATION OF PROJECT BIDDING
PLANS
1. The responsibility to evaluate bidding plans
a) For Group A and equivalent projects
The Ministry of Planning and Investment shall
have to assume the prime responsibility for the evaluation of project bidding
plans to be submitted to the Prime Minister for consideration and approval as
prescribed at Point a, Clause 2, Article 52 of the Bidding Regulation.
b) For Group B and equivalent projects
The evaluation of project bidding plans shall be
undertaken by the authorities evaluating the bidding results as prescribed in
Table 1 of Article 53 of the Bidding Regulation, concretely as follows:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
- For projects with the bidding plans to be
approved by presidents of the People’s Committees of the provinces and
centrally-run cities, the bidding plan-evaluating level shall be the
provincial/municipal Services of Planning and Investment;
- For projects with the bidding plans to be
approved by presidents of the People’s Committees of urban districts,
provincial towns, rural districts, district townships, communes and wards, the
evaluating level shall be their concerned attached units assisting the bidding.
c) For Group C projects and those with bidding
plans to be approved simultaneously together with investment decisions:
The evaluation of the project bidding plans
constitutes a content of the project evaluation (except for projects allowed to
make investment reports without having to be evaluated), which falls under the
responsibility of the project evaluating bodies and must comply with the
Bidding Regulation.
2. Contents of bidding plan evaluation
The project bidding plan evaluation content shall
cover the following tasks:
a) Checking such legal grounds of the bidding
plan elaboration as the feasibility study report, the investment decision, the
international agreement on financial support, cost estimate, total cost
estimate and other relevant legal documents if any;
b) Checking the compatibility of the bidding
plan contents with the relevant documents stated at Point b, Clause 2, Section
I of this Chapter and with the Bidding Regulation, the rationality of the
bidding plan against the practical conditions;
c) Comments and proposals of the evaluating
body.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
a) For Group A and equivalent projects
The bidding plan evaluation time shall not
exceed 30 days after the receipt of complete prescribed dossiers.
b) For other projects
The bidding plan evaluation time shall not
exceed 20 days after the receipt of complete prescribed dossiers.
Section III. APPROVAL OF BIDDING PLANS
The competent persons shall have to approve the
bidding plans. The time for approving a bidding plan shall not exceed 7 days
after the receipt of report from the evaluating body, except for the bidding
plans of Group A and equivalent projects, which shall be approved by the Prime
Minister according to the Government’s Working Regulations.
Section IV. EXAMPLES ON PROJECT BIDDING PLANS
See example 1 in Appendix IV.
Part Three
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Bidding dossiers comprise all documents on
requirements of a bidding package compiled by the bid solicitors, which shall
serve as legal basis for bidders to prepare their bids and for the bid
solicitors to evaluate bids.
Chapter I
COMPILATION OF BIDDING
DOSSIERS
Section I. RESPONSIBILITY TO COMPILE BIDDING
DOSSIERS
The compilation of the bidding dossiers
prescribed in Clause 1 of Article 20, Clause 2 of Article 22, Clause 2 of
Article 33, Point a, Clause 1 of Article 45, Clause 1 of Article 47 of the
Bidding Regulation shall be effected by the bid solicitors or hired experts.
The bidding dossiers constitute one of the important factors decisive to the
quality and efficiency of the bidding packages. Upon the compilation of bidding
dossiers, the agencies and/or individuals that are professionally qualified for
the bidding packages and knowledgeable about bidding should be employed so as
to ensure the quality of bidding dossiers and create favorable conditions for
bidders to prepare their bids and for the bid evaluation.
Section II. GROUNDS FOR BIDDING DOSSIER
COMPILATION
The compilation of bidding dossiers shall be
effected on the following bases:
1. The investment decision or investment license
and the feasibility study report or investment report enclosed therewith. For
biddings to select investment partners for execution of project when the
investment decision is not yet available, it shall be based on the written
approval of the competent persons;
2. The approved bidding plan;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
4. The State’s stipulations on bidding and the
signed international agreement on financial support if the ODA capital source
is used;
5. Other relevant policies of the State such as
taxes, wages, preferences for domestic bidders and other policies.
Chapter II
BIDDING DOSSIER REQUIREMENTS
AND CONTENTS
Section I. REQUIREMENTS ON THE BIDDING
DOSSIERS
The bidding dossiers must be complete, accurate,
clear, objective and compatible to the grounds stated in Section II, Chapter I,
Part Three of this Circular, according to the following contents:
1. Technically
a) For consultancy selection:
The contents in the reference provisions stated
in Section IV, Appendix I to this Circular.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The requirements on the scope of goods supply,
quantity, quality, technological criteria, production criteria, technical
properties, origins of equipment, warranty duration, environmental
requirements.
c) For construction and installation
The technical design dossiers enclosed with the
written anticipation of requirements on labor, construction machinery and
equipment, the environmental requirements, tempo and other requirements.
2. Financially and commercially
a) The bid prices according to FOB, CIF prices
or other prices.
b) The bid currency and comparative exchange
rate.
c) The financial source and other relevant
matters such as the purchaser’s credit, the seller’s credit, interest rates and
assorted charges, lending and repaying time.
d) Type of contract and relevant matters.
e) Payment conditions.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The bid evaluation criteria need to be stated
right in the bidding dossiers. When the evaluation criteria stated in the
bidding dossiers are not specific, the detailed evaluation criteria must be
drawn up and approved by the competent person or the competent level before the
bid opening. The bid evaluation criteria comprise the following principal
contents:
a) For consultancy bidding packages
The point-giving method shall be applied to bid
evaluation. The criteria for evaluation of consultancy bids shall include:
- The criteria for technical evaluation
(evaluation of technical recommendations).
The criteria for technical evaluation are those
for the evaluation of the contents of technical recommendation bags of bidders
(or also called technical criteria for short), more concretely:
+ On experience (around 10- 20% of the total
points)
This content includes:
* The experiences in performance of similar
bidding packages. The number of similar bidding packages performed by the
bidders in 3 to 5 latest years (depending on each bidding package).
* The experiences in performance of bidding
packages with similar conditions: The number of bidding packages with similar
natural, social and economic conditions performed in 3 to 5 latest years.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
. The bidder’s
capability: The quantity and quality of the existing contingent of the bidder’s specialists, turnover in 3 to
5 latest years.
~ Managerial experiences: The extent of
compatibility of the bidder’s
current management level to the requirement of the bidding package.
~ Other activities.
The point ratio and minimum number of points
required by each contents on experience shall be determined depending on the
characters of each bidding package.
+ On solutions and methodology (30-40% of the
total points).
This content include:
* The understanding of the purpose and
requirement of the bidding package: The extent of the bidder’s understanding of the purpose
and requirement of the bidding package is stated in the "reference
provisions".
* The methodology proposed by the bidder: The
comprehensiveness and rationality of the methodology proposed by the bidder as
compared to the requirements stated in the "reference provisions".
* Innovations: The innovations proposed by the
bidder shall be considered in the evaluation process.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
* Labor (month-person): The compatibility of
labor (month-person) proposed by the bidder with the requirements stated in the
bidding dossiers.
* Training and technology transfer: The
compatibility with the training requirements stated in the bidding dossiers,
such as the number of trainees, the training duration, forms of training- on
site, in class, domestic, overseas; and with the technological transfer
contents such as documents and software to be transferred.
* Working facilities: The reasonability of the
requirements for support in working place, equipment, supporting personnel of
the bid solicitor, travel means.
* Presentation method: The method of bid
presentation by the bidder.
The point ratio and minimum number of points
required for each content on solution and methodology shall be determined
depending on the nature of each bidding package.
+ Criteria on personnel (about 50-60% of the
total points).
This content includes:
* Personnel according to the title of each
expert: Titles of personnel participating in the ordinary bidding package shall
include the chief adviser (team leader) and the titles of other experts on
specific domains. The point ratio and minimum number of points of the titles
shall be determined depending on the nature of each bidding package. Usually,
the chief adviser’s points
account for the highest percentage. Upon the personnel evaluation according to
each title, attention should be paid to some following points:
~ For the chief adviser (team leader): The
requirement on his/her experience is that he/she has already worked as chief
adviser in previous projects. At the same time, the requirements on his/her
capability and experience are like the requirements on an expert in a specific
domain. The expert working in the capacity as a chief adviser must have at
least 5 years of working in the specialized field related to the project.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
~ Depending on the nature of each bidding
package, the signatures of key experts are required as commitment to their
curricula vitae as well as time fund for the performance of the bidding package
as stated in the bidding dossiers (Form 4, Section VI, Appendix I to this
Circular).
* The personnel criteria for each title shall be
considered on the basis of the 4 following contents:
~ General experience (10-20% of the total points
of each title): Educational level, number of working years.
~ Experiences related to the bidding package
(60-70% of the total points of each title): The number of similar bidding
packages already performed.
~ Other factors (10-20% of the total points of
each title): Experience in working overseas, foreign languages…
~ Experts on permanent staff of the bidder (5%
of the total points of each title).
- Criteria for the general technical and price
evaluation.
The general evaluation criteria include the
technical criteria and the price criteria, in which the technical criteria must
not be lower than 70% and the price criteria must not be higher than 30% of the
total points. The evaluation method, the formula for determining the price
points and the general points are stated in Clause 9, Section III, Appendix I
to this Circular.
b) For goods procurement bidding packages:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The criteria for evaluation of the bidder’s capabilities and experiences
for the goods procurement bidding packages provided for in Clause 1, Article 29
of the Bidding Regulation include the following contents:
+ The production and business capabilities: The
major manufacturing and trading products (quantity and categories), the
quantity and qualifications of professional staff, the material and technical
foundation of the bidder.
+ The financial capability: The total asset,
working capital, turnover, before- and after-tax profits in 3 to 5 latest
years.
+ Experiences: The number of years with working
experiences. The number of similar contracts already performed in 3 to 5 latest
years in Vietnam and foreign countries.
Depending on the nature of each bidding package,
the time required for the calculation of financial capability (through norms on
total assets, working capital, turnover, profits) and the time required for the
performance of similar contracts may be less than 3 years provided that it
suits the practical situation of the project and is approved by the competent
person or the competent level.
The three contents mentioned above shall not be
given points but only considered according two standards "pass" or
"fail" in order to determine the bidder’s
capabilities to participate in the bidding. Those bidders who pass all three
above contents shall be considered as having enough capabilities and
experiences for participation in the bidding.
- Criteria for technical evaluation to select
the short list.
The criteria for technical evaluation prescribed
in Clauses 2, 3 and 4 of Article 29 of the Bidding Regulation include the
following contents:
+ Technical requirements:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
* The eco-technical properties, codes of
supplies and equipment, names of manufacturing firms and countries, the year of
manufacture.
* The rationality and economic efficiency of
technical solutions, organizational measures for delivery of supplies and
equipment to the place of installation.
* Technical personnel’s
capability for equipment and facility installation.
* The technical adaptability.
* The geographical adaptability.
* Impacts on the environment and handling
measures.
+ Financial supply capability (if so requested).
+ Other contents:
* Contractual terms: The extent of meeting the
contractual terms stated in the bidding dossiers.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
* Technological transfer: Capability of technological
transfer to the entire project or part by part of the project.
* Training: The plans for domestic and overseas
training of officials and workers directly performing and taking over the jobs.
* Other contents, if any.
The point scale of 100 or 1,000 shall be used
for the evaluation of the above-mentioned technical contents to select the
short list. Depending on the nature of each bidding package, the point ratio
and minimum number of points required for each content shall be determined. The
minimum points for all the above contents, as prescribed, must not be lower
than 70% of the total points, meaning the minimum points may represent 70, 71,
72,.. 80%, depending on the
nature of each bidding package.
- Criteria for bringing things to the same floor
for determination of the evaluation prices.
The criteria for bringing things to the same
floor for determination of the evaluation prices include the following
principal contents:
+ The use duration: The life span of machine,
depreciation time;
+ The capacity of the entire production chain,
the capacity of main equipment (calculated into product unit price). The
standards on product quality;
+ The manufacturing technology: Origins of
equipment, manufacturing standards, technological level;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
+ Expenses for maintenance, renovation,
overhauls;
+ Commercial terms (payment terms, warranty
terms), financial terms (loan interests, assorted charges).
c) For construction and installation bidding
packages:
- Criteria for evaluation of bidders’ capabilities and experiences:
The criteria on bidders’
capabilities and experiences provided for in Clause 2, Article 40 of the
Bidding Regulation include:
+ Experiences: The number of years with working
experience. The number of similar contracts performed within 3 to 5 latest
years in similar geographical areas, on similar sites;
+ The quantity and qualifications of officials
and technical workers of the bidders;
+ The financial capability: Turnover, before-
and after-tax profits, working capital, for 3 to 5 latest years.
The 3 above contents shall not be given points
but only be considered according to two standards "pass" or "fail"
to determine the bidders’
capabilities to participate in the biddings. Those bidders who pass all the
three above contents are considered as having full capabilities and experiences
for participation in the bidding.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The technical evaluation criteria prescribed in
Clauses 1, 3 and 4 of Article 40 of the Bidding Regulation include the
following contents:
+ Technical and quality requirements:
* The extent of satisfying the requirements on
techniques, quality of the supplies and equipment stated in the technical
design dossiers and technical instructions.
* The rationality and feasibility of technical
solutions, organizational measures for construction: The general timetable
chart, the site organization chart, personnel arrangement, technical solutions.
* Measures to ensure the conditions on
environmental hygiene and other safety conditions such as fire and explosion
prevention, labor safety.
* The extent of meeting requirements by
construction equipment: The quantity, types, quality of equipment (the
depreciation level already made), form of ownership over the equipment (own or
rented) arranged for the bidding package.
* Measures to ensure quality.
+ Financial supply capability (if so requested)
+ Other contents:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
* The capability to enter into partnership with
Vietnamese contractors, to use Vietnamese subcontractors by foreign bidders in
case of international biddings.
* Other contents if so requested in the bidding
dossiers.
Depending on the nature of each bidding package,
the point ratio and minimum number of points required for each content shall be
determined.
- Criteria for bringing things to the same floor
for the determination of evaluation prices.
The evaluation floor may include the following
criteria:
+ The volume, raw materials and materials
according to the bidding dossiers;
+ Expenses for operation, maintenance of the
project;
+ Construction conditions;
+ Commercial terms (payment and warranty terms),
financial terms (if any);
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
+ The project use duration.
4. Other contents.
a) Different kinds of tax as prescribed by law.
b) Project insurance and warranty.
Section II. CONTENTS OF THE BIDDING DOSSIERS
Depending on the nature of each bidding package,
the principal contents of the bidding dossier are defined in Clause 1, Article
20 of the Bidding Regulation for consultancy selection, Article 24 for goods
procurement, Article 35 for construction and installation, Clause 2 of Article
45 for small-sized bidding packages and Clause 1 of Article 47 for the
selection of partners for project execution. Besides, to get more detailed
information, the contents of the bidding dossiers for three major domains:
consultancy, goods procurement and construction- installation are guided in the
appendices to this Circular (for the bidding dossiers to select partners for
project execution, the contents for consultancy selection may apply), more
concretely:
Appendix I: Guiding form of the consultancy
bidding dossier.
Appendix II: Guiding forms of the preliminary
selection dossier and the goods procurement bidding dossier.
Appendix III: Guiding forms of the preliminary
selection dossier and construction-installation bidding dossier.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
APPROVAL OF BIDDING DOSSIERS
Approving the bidding dossiers shall fall within
the responsibility of the competent persons or the competent levels prescribed
at Point e, Clause 1, Article 51 of the Bidding Regulation. The time for
approving a bidding dossier shall not exceed 10 days for small-sized bidding
packages and 20 days for other bidding packages.
Part Four
BID EVALUATION
Chapter I
CONSULTANCY BID EVALUATION
Section I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
The evaluation of consultancy bids prescribed at
Point a, Clause 2, Article 13; Clauses 7, 8 and 9 of Article 20 of the Bidding Regulation
is made in the following two steps:
1. Step 1: Opening the technical proposal
dossier-bag for consideration and evaluation by method of point giving.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Section II. EVALUATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
DOSSIERS
1. Preliminary evaluation
a) Examining each bid’s
administrative and legal compatibility with the requirements stated in the
bidding dossier.
b) Clarifying bids: Bid clarification is
prescribed in Article 11 of the Bidding Regulation. The documents requesting
bidders to clarify their bids need to clearly state the time the bidder shall
have to send their written clarifications.
2. Detailed evaluation of bids
The detailed technical evaluation of each bid
shall be based on the evaluation criteria prescribed in the bidding dossiers
and the detailed evaluation criteria approved before the bid opening as
mentioned at Point a, Clause 3, Section I, Chapter II, Part Three of this
Circular.
Section III. EVALUATION OF FINANCIAL PROPOSAL
DOSSIERS
Following the evaluation of technical proposals,
the list of bidders who have met the technical requirements (scoring 70% or
more of the total technical points) shall be submitted to the competent person
or the competent level for approval, then the financial proposal dossier-bags
may be opened to give points on prices. Later, the bids shall be
comprehensively evaluated according to point structure in terms of technical
aspects and prices prescribed in the bidding dossiers for classification.
Section IV. NEGOTIATING THE CONTRACTS
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The contract negotiation needs to focus on the
following contents:
1. The tasks and detailed contents of the
consultancy work to be performed;
2. The contents of technological transfer and
training;
3. The working plan and personnel arrangement;
4. Tempo;
5. Handling of personnel change if any;
6. The arrangement of working conditions;
7. Contents of consultancy costs, including
expenses specified in Article 21 of the Bidding Regulation, paying attention to
expenses other than the paid wages according to the principle of payment by
actual spending which, however, must not exceed the mutually agreed level.
If the negotiation contents are agreed upon
between the two parties, in which the value of the proposed contract shall not
exceed the value of the bidding package in the approved bidding plan, the
bidder shall be recommended as the bid winner. In case of negotiation failure,
the bid solicitor shall report it to the competent person or competent level,
asking for permission to invite the bidder ranking next for the contract
negotiation.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
EVALUATION OF GOODS PROCUREMENT BIDS
The evaluation of goods procurement bids shall
be conducted under the provisions in Clause 2, Article 13 and Article 30 of the
Bidding Regulation according to the following order:
Section I. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF BIDS
1. Checking the bids’
validity and considering their basic satisfaction of the bidding dossier’s requirements
The bid solicitor shall consider every bid’s validity and basic
satisfaction of the conditions prescribed in the bidding dossier so as to
determine bids qualified for the next consideration. Checking bids’ validity and basic satisfaction
shall cover the following contents:
a) The business registration papers, licenses to
sell goods under the producers’
copyrights with regard to complex equipment and as required by the bidding
dossier;
b) The numbers of originals and copies of bids
as required by the bidding dossier;
c) The application for participation in
biddings, which is completely filled in and signed by the head of the bidder’s organization or the authorized
person enclosed with the letter of authorization;
d) The validity of bid guaranty;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
f) The bidder’s
capabilities and experience;
g) Appendices and other enclosed documents as
required by the bidding dossier;
h) Other requirements, if any.
2. Bid clarification
The bid clarification may be made directly or
indirectly but presented in documents which shall serve as legal bases for bid
consideration and evaluation. In the course of clarification, bidders must not
alter the nature of their bids and must not change the bid prices.
3. Elimination of bids
Bids shall be eliminated when they fail to
satisfy the validity condition and basic requirements being considered the
pre-conditions stated in the bidding dossiers. Thereby, the pre-conditions for
elimination of bids shall include:
a) The bidder’s
name is not on the list of those registering their participation and the list
of those who buy or are supplied with the bidding dossiers;
b) The bids are not submitted at the right
places and on the right time prescribed in the bidding dossiers; for this case,
the bids shall be returned in tact;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
d) Bids are submitted not with their originals,
but only with their copies;
e) Failure to fully submit the regular papers
prescribed as conditions for participation in biddings such as copies of
business registration papers, licenses for sale of goods under the producers’ copyrights, if so requested;
f) Lacking valid signatures in the application
for bidding participation;
g) Bids putting forward conditions contrary to
the requirements of the bidding dossiers;
h) Bids containing unfixed bid prices like
making the offer with two price levels, conditional price;
i) The bidder’s
name is found in two or more bids for one bidding package in the capacity as
independent or partnership bidders;
k) Failure to meet the requirements on
capabilities and experiences according to the evaluation criteria stated in the
bidding dossiers and the detailed evaluation criteria approved before the bid
opening. For bidding packages which have already gone through preliminary
selection, it is necessary to update information in order to re-examine the
information declared by bidders at the time of preliminary selection for
verification of the possibility of satisfying the capability and experience
requirements by bidders, eliminating those bidders, who are incapable of
meeting the set requirements. For bidding packages which do not go through
preliminary selection, the criteria on bidders’
capabilities and experiences shall be evaluated according to the contents
stated at Point b, Clause 3, Section I, Chapter II, Part Three of this
Circular;
l) Other pre-conditions with particular
characters of the bidding packages.
Those bidders who fail to meet one of the
above-mentioned pre-conditions shall be eliminated from being considered in the
detailed evaluation step.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
1. Step 1: Technical evaluation for selection of
the short list:
Based on the technical evaluation criteria
stated at Point b, Clause 3, Section I, Chapter II, Part Three of this
Circular, the bid solicitor shall proceed with the bid evaluation on the basis
of point giving.
Bids which meet the requirements with the
minimum number of points or more as prescribed in the evaluation criteria shall
be selected for the short list for further evaluation in Step 2.
2. Step 2: Financial and commercial evaluation
to determine the evaluation prices:
Based on the bid prices offered by bidders, the
bid solicitor shall proceed with the determination of the evaluation prices of
bids on the short list according to the following contents and order:
a) Error correction:
Error correction means the correction of errors,
including arithmetic errors, typing errors and unit miscalculation. If there is
any error between the unit price and the total price due to wrong
multiplication of the unit price by the volume, the unit price shall serve as
legal basis.
When making error correction according to the
above-mentioned principle, the bid solicitor shall notify the bidders thereof.
If the bidders refuse to accept such error correction, their bids shall be
eliminated. Where a bid contains arithmetic errors with difference representing
over 15% (according to absolute value, without depending on the increase or
decrease of bid prices when determining the evaluation prices) of the bid
prices, it shall also be eliminated from further consideration.
b) Adjustment of disparities
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Upon the determination of evaluation prices, the
superfluous offer shall be subtracted and the insufficient offer shall be added
according to the principle that if it is inseparable from the bid price, the
highest offer price shall be chosen for this content (in case of insufficient
offer) and the lowest level among the other bids on the short list shall be
taken (in case of superfluous offer).
- Adding or adjusting disparities between bid
sections:
The adjustment of disparities in bids aims to
ensure the consistency of bids. The disparities commonly seen in bids, which
need to be adjusted, include:
+ The disparity between the value written in
figures in tables and the values written in words in the explanation; for this
case, the value written in words shall be used as legal basis;
+ The disparity between the general unit prices
in the general price tables and the detail unit prices in the analytical unit
price tables; for this case, the detail unit prices shall be used as legal
basis;
+ The disparity between the technical offer
contents and the financial offer contents; for this case, the technical offer
contents shall be used as legal basis.
Bids with the total disparity value exceeding
10% (calculated according to absolute value, without depending on the increase
or decrease of the bid prices when determining the evaluation prices) of the
bid prices shall be eliminated from further consideration.
c) Conversion of bid prices into a common
currency:
Converting the bid prices, if any, according to
the exchange rates set by the bid solicitor in the bidding dossiers.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Bringing things to the same floor for
determination of the evaluation prices shall cover the contents mentioned at
Point b, Clause 3, Section I, Chapter II, Part Three of this Circular.
Section III. BID CLASSIFICATION
The classification of bids on the short list
shall be made according to the evaluation prices. Those bidders with the lowest
evaluation prices shall be ranked first and recommended for bid winning.
Section IV. EXAMPLES ON EVALUATION OF GOODS
PROCUREMENT BIDS
See example 2 in Appendix IV.
Chapter III
EVALUATION OF BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION
The evaluation of bids for construction and
installation shall comply with the provisions of Clause 2, Article 13 and
Article 41 of the Bidding Regulation according to the following order:
Section I. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF BIDS
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The contents of checking the bids’ validity and basic requirement
satisfaction shall comply with the provisions on goods procurement bidding
packages stated in Clause 1, Section I, Chapter II, Part Four of this Circular.
Bids are considered as having basically met the
requirements of the bidding dossiers when they satisfy the requirements, conditions
and technical characters of the bidding dossiers without disparities or
limitations in materials which affect the scale, quality or implementation of
projects and without restricting the bid solicitors’
powers or the bidders’
obligations.
The determination of a bid as being invalid or
failing to meet the basic requirements must be made in an objective manner
according to the requirements of the bidding dossier.
2. Bid clarification
The bid clarification shall comply with the
provisions on goods procurement stated in Clause 2, Section I, Chapter II, Part
Four of this Circular.
3. Bid elimination
The bid elimination shall comply with the
provisions on goods procurement stated in Clause 3, Section I, Chapter II, Part
Four of this Circular.
Particularly for the determination of the extent
of meeting the requirements on capabilities and experiences by bidders, it
should be based on the criteria prescribed in the bidding dossiers and the
detailed evaluation criteria approved before the bid opening stated at Point c,
Clause 3, Section I, Chapter II, Part Three of this Circular.
Section II. DETAILED EVALUATION OF BIDS
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The technical evaluation for selection of the short
list shall be based on the requirements and evaluation criteria prescribed in
the bidding dossiers and the detailed evaluation criteria already approved
according to the contents stated at Point c, Clause 3, Section I, Chapter II,
Part Three of this Circular.
Those bids scoring the minimum number of points
or more shall be selected into the short list for further evaluation in Step 2.
2. Step 2: Financial and commercial evaluation
for determination of evaluation prices:
Based on the bid prices offered by bidders, the
bid solicitor shall proceed with the determination of evaluation prices of bids
on the short list according to the following contents and order:
a) Error correction:
The error correction shall be carried out like
that for goods procurement.
b) Adjustment of disparities:
It shall comply with that for goods procurement.
c) Conversion of bid prices into one common
currency:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
d) Bringing things to the same floor for
determination of evaluation prices:
The bringing of things to the same floor for
evaluation price determination shall comply with the criteria stated at Point
c, Clause 3, Section I, Chapter II, Part Three of this Circular.
Section III. CLASSIFICATION OF BIDDERS
ACCORDING TO EVALUATION PRICES
Bidders on the short list with the lowest
evaluation prices shall be ranked first and recommended for bid winning.
Chapter IV
EVALUATION OF BIDS FOR SMALL-SIZED BIDDING PACKAGES
The evaluation of bids for small-sized bidding
packages is stipulated at Point c, Clause 2, Article 45 and Clause 4, Article
45 of the Bidding Regulation, including the following contents:
Section I. EVALUATION PRINCIPLES
1. The evaluation must be simple, quick,
accurate and fair.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
3. Determining prices for comparison of bids on
the short list, which meet the technical requirements to make classification
and select the bid winner.
Section II. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF BIDS
1. Checking the bids’
compatibility with the bidding dossiers’
legal and administrative requirements so as to determine bidders with valid
bids. Bidders may be requested to clarify bids according to general
regulations.
2. Eliminating bids which are invalid and/or
fail to satisfy the capability and experience requirements stated in the
bidding dossiers.
Section III. DETAILED TECHNICAL EVALUATION TO
MAKE THE SHORT LIST
1. For goods procurement
a) The extent of meeting the requirements on
technology, quality, quantity and technical properties of goods;
b) Implementation time.
2. For construction and installation
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
b) The implementation time.
Section IV. DETERMINATION OF PRICE FOR BID
COMPARISON
The price for comparison of bids shall be
determined on the basis of bid prices offered by bidders after error correction
and disparity adjustment. The error correction and disparity adjustment shall
be carried out like for bidding packages on goods procurement as well as
construction and installation mentioned at Points a and b, Clause 2, Section
II, Chapter II, and at Points a and b, Clause 2, Section II, Chapter III, Part
Four of this Circular. Those bidders who have the lowest bid prices after the
error correction and disparity adjustment shall be ranked first and recommended
for bid winning.
Section V. TIME LIMIT FOR BID EVALUATION
The time limit for evaluation of a bid for a
small-sized bidding package shall not exceed 10 days.
Section VI. EXAMPLE ON EVALUATION OF BIDS FOR
SMALL-SIZED BIDDING PACKAGES
See example 3, Appendix IV.
Part Five
SUBMITTING FOR APPROVAL, EVALUATING, APPROVING AND
ANNOUNCING BIDDING RESULTS, FINALIZATION AND SIGNING OF CONTRACTS
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
SUBMITTING FOR APPROVAL, EVALUATING AND APPROVING THE
BIDDING RESULTS
Section I. SUBMITTING FOR APPROVAL THE
BIDDING RESULTS
1. Responsibility to submit the bidding results
for approval
The investors or project owners shall have to
submit the bidding results to competent persons or competent levels for
consideration and approval. For bidding packages of Group A and the equivalent
which fall under the Prime Minister’s
approving responsibility, the submission of bidding results to the Prime
Minister shall be made by ministers, heads of the ministerial-level agencies or
agencies attached to the Government, the Management Boards of State
corporations set up by the Prime Minister and the presidents of the
provincial/municipal People’s
Committees according to the Government’s
Working Regulations. Where the Management Boards of the State corporations set
up by the Prime Minister submit the bidding results to the Prime Minister, the
branch- managing ministries (if any) shall have to send their written comments
to the Prime Minister, clearly stating matters related to techniques,
technologies, the management of branches related to the bidding packages, the
specific remarks and proposals on the bidding results submitted by the
above-said Management Boards.
2. Bidding result submission dossiers
The dossiers for bidding result submission (for
various bidding domains) shall include:
a) The bidding result submission documents:
The bidding result submission documents need to
indicate the following details:
- The bidding package contents and legal basis
for organization of the bidding;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
- The bid evaluation results;
- The request for approval of bidding results,
clearly stating the name of bidder proposed for bid winning (including the
names of partnership contractors or subcontractors, if any), the proposed
bid-winning price, type of contract and implementation duration. For proposed
bid-winning price, such relevant contents as tax, reserve, inflation rate, if
any, must also be stated.
b) Materials attached to the submission documents:
The materials attached to bidding result
submission documents shall include copies of the following:
- The report on bid evaluation by the experts’ or consultants’ team;
- The investment decision or equivalent legal
document, the international agreement on financial support, if any;
- The written approval of the basic contents of
the bidding process as prescribed at Points a, b, c, d, e, f and g of Clause 1,
Article 51 of the Bidding Regulation;
- The decision on setting up of experts’ or consultants�
team.
- The minutes of bid opening, documents related
to bid clarification, if any, requested by the bid solicitor and made by the
bidder;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
- The draft contract, if any;
- The bidding dossier and bids of bidders;
- The preliminary comments on bidding results of
the foreign donors (if any);
- Other relevant materials.
Section II. EVALUATION OF BIDDING RESULTS
1. The evaluation responsibility
The agencies responsible for evaluating the
bidding results are defined in Table 1 of Article 53 of the Bidding Regulation.
The bidding result-evaluating agencies and individuals must have knowledge
about bidding, firmly grasp the Bidding Regulation, must not join the experts’ team assisting in the bidding
packages they have to evaluate, ensure the honesty, objectiveness and fairness
in evaluation and take responsibility for their evaluation opinions as provided
for in Article 52 of the Bidding Regulation.
2. Contents of bidding result evaluation
The contents of bidding result evaluation shall
cover the following major issues:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
b) The procedures and time for organizing the
bidding: The time for distribution of bidding dossiers, the time for preparing
bids, the time for bid opening (according to bid opening minutes), the time for
bid evaluation against the prescribed time;
c) Examining the contents of bid evaluation by
experts’ team: Documents on
point giving, evaluation comments of each expert, the sum-up report of the
experts’ team, the
evaluation by foreign consultants if any, the compatibility of the evaluation
with the bidding dossier’s
requirements and the approved evaluation criteria, the extent of accuracy of
the evaluation;
d) Examining the unclear contents in the bidding
result submission dossiers;
e) Opinion divergence, if any, between the
experts’ team, foreign
consultants and the bid solicitors, as well as other opinions.
In the course of evaluating the bidding results,
attention should be drawn to the fact that the evaluation of the bidding
results does not mean the re-evaluation of bids.
3. The contents of written report on evaluation
The written report on evaluation results to be
submitted to persons or levels competent to approve the bidding results include
the following major details:
a) The outline of the project and bidding
package: Outlining the project contents and the bidding package contents, the
legal bases for conducting the bidding;
b) Brief description of the bidding process and
bid evaluation results proposed by body submitting the results for approval;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
d) Recommendations of the bidding result
evaluating agency and solutions to existing problematic cases.
4. The time for evaluation of the bidding
results
The time for evaluation of the bidding results
prescribed in Clause 2, Article 54 of the Bidding Regulation shall not exceed
30 days for bidding packages falling under the Prime Minister’s approving jurisdiction, 20
days for other bidding packages, after fully receiving the valid dossiers. For
small-sized bidding packages, depending on the nature of each bidding package,
the evaluation of bidding results shall depend on the requirements of the
competent person or level before approving them. The time for evaluation of the
results of bidding for a small-sized bidding package shall not exceed 7 days
after the full receipt of dossiers.
Section III. APPROVING THE BIDDING RESULTS
The responsibility to approve the bidding
results shall rest with the competent persons or the competent levels
prescribed in Article 52 and Article 53 of the Bidding Regulation. Except for
problematic bidding packages which need to be handled, the time for approval of
the bidding results shall not exceed 5 days for small-sized bidding packages
and 7 days for other bidding packages after the receipt of report from the
evaluation agency. The bidding packages to be approved by the Prime Minister
shall comply with the Government’s
Working Regulations.
Chapter II
ANNOUNCEMENT OF BIDDING RESULTS, NEGOTIATION ON
CONTRACT FINALIZATION
The announcement of bidding results and
negotiation on contract finalization prescribed in Clause 3 of Article 13,
Clause 13 of Article 20, Clause 8 of Article 22, Clause 8 of Article 33 and
Clause 7 of Article 47, of the Bidding Regulation shall cover:
Section I. ANNOUNCEMENT OF BIDDING RESULTS
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Immediately after obtaining the decisions of the
competent persons or the competent levels, the bid solicitor shall proceed with
the announcement of bidding results through written notices on the bidding
results, sent to participating bidders, including the bid winners and the bid
failers as well. Where there is no bid winner or the bidding is cancelled, the
bid solicitor shall also have to notify the bidders thereof.
2. Updating information on bidders’ capabilities
Before signing official contracts, the bid
solicitor shall update changes in the bidders’
capabilities as well as other information related to the bidders. If detecting
any changes which affect the contract performance capacity such as the
declining financial capabilities, bankruptcy danger, the bid solicitor shall
have to promptly report such to the competent persons or the competent levels
for consideration and decision.
3. Requirements on announcement of bid winning
The bid solicitor must send written notices on
bid winning to the bid winners together with the draft contracts and noticeable
points to be discussed in negotiation on contract finalization. At the same
time, the bid solicitor shall also inform the bidders of the time table,
clearly stating the requirement on time for negotiation on contract
finalization, the deposit paid as guarantee for the contract performance and
the signing of contract.
Section II. NEGOTIATION ON FINALIZATION AND
SIGNING OF CONTRACTS
1. Upon receiving the bid winning notice, the
bid winner shall have to send to the bid solicitor a letter accepting the
negotiation on contract finalization. Within no more than 30 days after the
issuance of notice, if the bid solicitor receives neither the letter of acceptance
nor the letter of refusal from the bidder, the former shall notify such to the
competent person or the competent level for consideration and decision.
2. According to the mutually agreed time-table,
the two parties shall proceed with the contract finalization negotiation so as
to be able to sign the official contract.
The contract finalization negotiation covers
contents aiming to solve existing incomplete matters on the contract by the bid
winner, particularly the application of prices to disparities against the
requirements of the bidding dossiers on the principle that the contract value
shall not exceed the approved bid-winning price. The contract finalization
negotiation shall also cover the study of innovations and superior solutions
proposed by the bidders.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
3. The bid solicitor shall receive the contract
performance guarantee from the bid winner before signing the contract as
provided for at Point a, Clause 3, Article 32 of the Bidding Regulation. The
conditions for the bidders to prepare the contract performance guarantee shall
be the bidding result- approving decisions of the competent persons or
competent levels and the bid-winning announcement of the bid solicitor. If the
guaranteeing banks request the submission of the signed contracts before
issuing the guarantee papers, such must be reported to the competent persons or
the competent levels for consideration and decision. For this case, the
contract may be signed in advance but the guarantee must be paid before the
contract takes effect. Where the bidder has signed the contract and already paid
the contract performance guarantee, but failed to perform the contract, the bid
solicitor may not refund the contract performance guarantee to the bidder.
4. The bid solicitor shall return the bid
guarantee, if any, only when receiving the contract performance guarantee from
the bid winner. For bidders who have failed at biddings and not breached the
Bidding Regulation, even when there is not bidding result, the bid solicitor
shall return the bid guarantee to such bidders within no more than 30 days
after the announcement of the bidding results.
Part Six
APPROVAL OF BIDDING PLANS AND BIDDING RESULTS FOR
JOINT-VENTURE, BUSINESS COOPERATION CONTRACT OR SHARE-HOLDING PROJECTS
Chapter I
APPROVING RESPONSIBILITY
For joint-venture or business cooperation
contract projects prescribed at Point b, Clause 2, Article 2 of the Bidding
Regulation, the agencies which grant the investment licenses shall have the
responsibility to approve the bidding plans and the bidding results. For
projects of share-holding enterprises prescribed at Point b, Clause 2, Article
2 of the Bidding Regulation, the responsibility to approve the bidding plans
and the bidding results shall rest with the agencies which decide the
contribution of the State’s
share capital to the share-holding enterprises.
Chapter II
APPROVAL OF BIDDING PLANS
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The legal basis for elaboration and approval of
bidding plans for joint-venture and business cooperation contract projects are
the investment license and the feasibility study report enclose therewith; for
projects of share-holding enterprises, the legal basis shall be the investment
decisions of enterprises
Where the value of the bidding packages included
in the bidding plan exceeds the total investment level, the investment
decisions or the investment licenses must be supplemented according to the
current law provisions before requesting the approval.
Section II. RESPONSIBILITY TO REQUEST THE
APPROVAL
The Management Boards (or persons authorized by
the Management Boards) of joint-venture enterprises or share-holding
enterprises or the lawful representatives of the parties to the business
cooperation contract shall have the responsibility to issue documents
requesting the approval of the bidding plans of the projects under their
respective management.
Section III. DOSSIERS OF REQUESTING THE
APPROVAL OF THE BIDDING PLANS
The dossiers of requesting the approval of
bidding plan shall include:
1. The written request for the approval
The written requests for the approval of the
project bidding plans need to state the legal bases for the elaboration of the
bidding plans, the volume of work already performed, the volume of work not
opened to bidding and the volume of work to be opened to bidding (the project
bidding plans) as required at Point a, Clause 2, Section I, Chapter III, Part
Two of this Circular. The project bidding plans need to fully demonstrate the
contents mentioned in Chapter II, Part Two and Example 1, Appendix IV to this
Circular.
The written request for agreement shall be made
in Vietnamese language.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
When sending written requests for the approval
of project bidding plans, the copies of the following documents need to be sent
in attachment thereto: The investment decision, the investment license, the
feasibility study report and other relevant documents, if any.
Section IV. EVALUATION FOR APPROVAL OF
BIDDING PLANS
1. Evaluation responsibility
For projects granted with the investment
licenses by the Ministry of Planning and Investment, the evaluation of the
bidding plans in order to issue the written approval shall fall within the
responsibility of the Ministry of Planning and Investment. For the provinces
and centrally-run cities, such evaluation shall rest with the
provincial/municipal Planning and Investment Services.
2. Contents of bidding plan evaluation
The bidding plan evaluation shall cover tasks
mentioned in Clause 2, Section II, Chapter III, Part Two of this Circular.
3. The time for evaluation and approval of a
bidding plan
The time for evaluation and approval of a
bidding plan shall not exceed 20 days from the time the complete dossiers are
received till the time the written approval of the bidding plan is issued.
Chapter III
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Section I. REQUIREMENTS ON THE BIDDING RESULT
APPROVAL
The bidding result approval shall be effected
for bidding packages with bidding plans already approved. Joint-venture
enterprises, parties to business cooperation contracts or share-holding
enterprises need to organize biddings after having the bidding plans approved
and strictly adhere to the contents of the approved bidding plans such as the
bidding package prices, the form of selecting bidders, bidding mode, types of
contract. A number of basic contents of the bidding process such as the
establishment of experts’
or consultants’ teams to
assist the bidding, the list of bidders participating in restricted bidding,
the bidding dossiers, the evaluation criteria, approval of the contract
contents and other contents shall fall under the deciding jurisdiction of the
Management Boards (or persons authorized by the Management Boards) of joint-
venture enterprises, share-holding enterprises or lawful representatives of
parties to the business cooperation contracts.
Section II. RESPONSIBILITY TO PROPOSE THE
APPROVAL OF BIDDING RESULTS
The Management Boards (or persons authorized by
the Management Boards) of joint-venture enterprises, share-holding enterprises
or lawful representatives of parties to the business cooperation contracts have
the responsibility to issue written documents proposing the approval of the
bidding results of the bidding packages of the projects under their respective management.
Section III. DOSSIERS PROPOSING THE APPROVAL
OF BIDDING RESULTS
The dossiers proposing the approval of bidding
results shall include:
1. The written request for approval of the
bidding results
The written request for approval of the bidding
results should state the legal bases for the organization of the bidding, the
contents of the bidding package, the process of organizing the bidding, the
result of bid evaluation, the proposal on bidding results. The name of the
bidder proposed for bid winning (including the names of partnership bidders and
subcontractors if any), the proposed bid-winning price, the type of contract
and the performance duration shall also be clearly stated therein. For the
proposed bid-winning price, such relevant contents as tax, reserve, inflation,
if any, should be touched upon.
The written request for the approval of bidding
results shall be made in Vietnamese language.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Materials to be attached to the written request
for bidding result approval shall include the copies of the following
materials:
a) The bid evaluation report of the experts’ or consultants’ team;
b) The documents approving the basic contents of
the bidding results as prescribed at Points b, c, d, e, f and g of Clause 1,
Article 51 of the Bidding Regulation;
c) The decision on establishment of the experts’ or consultants’ team;
d) The minutes of bid opening, documents related
to the bid clarification, if any, requested by the bid solicitor and made by
the bidder;
e) The minutes of the contract negotiation for
consultancy selection bidding;
f) The draft contract, if any;
d) The bidding dossiers and bid of the bidder
proposed for bid winning;
h) Other relevant documents.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
1. Evaluation responsibility
The agencies that issue documents to approve the
bidding results shall conduct the evaluation if deeming it necessary. For the
bidding plans to be approved by the Ministry of Planning and Investment, the
evaluation for issuance of the written approval of the bidding results shall
fall within the responsibility of the Ministry of Planning and Investment. The
presidents of the People’s
Committees of the provinces and centrally-run cities shall approve the bidding
results on the basis of the evaluation by the provincial/municipal Planning and
Investment Services.
2. Contents of bidding result evaluation
The bidding result evaluation shall cover tasks
specified in Clause 2, Section II, Chapter I, Part Five of this Circular.
3. The time for evaluation and approval of
bidding results
The time for evaluation and approval of the
bidding results counted from the date of full receipt of the dossiers to the
date of issuing the written approval of the bidding results shall not exceed 20
days.
Part Seven
IMPLEMENTATION ORGANIZATION AND EFFECT
Chapter I
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Section I. EXISTING MATTERS TO BE SETTLED
AFTER THE PROMULGATION OF THE BIDDING REGULATION
1. For the bidding packages with bidding
dossiers already distributed, Decrees No.43/CP and No.93/CP shall apply.
2. For the bidding packages with bidding results
already submitted, the evaluation and approval of the bidding results shall be
carried out according to the responsibility division provided for in Decrees
No.43/CP and No.93/CP.
3. For the bidding packages with bidding
dossiers not yet distributed, the bidding shall be organized according to
Decree No.88/1999/ND-CP of September 1st, 1999 and Decree No.14/2000/ND-CP of
May 5, 2000 of the Government.
4. For ODA projects with the international
agreements on financial support being signed before the issuance of the Bidding
Regulation, the signed agreements shall continue to apply.
Section II. REPORT ON THE SITUATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BIDDING WORK
1. Biannually and annually, the investors or
project owners shall make and send sum-up reports to their immediate superior
State management bodies.
2. Annually, the ministries, the
ministerial-level agencies, the agencies attached to the Government, the State
corporations set up by the Prime Minister and the People’s
Committees of the provinces and centrally-run cities shall have to make and
send sum-up reports to the Ministry of Planning and Investment before December
31st for further sum-up and submission to the Prime Minister.
Section III. INSPECTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION
OF BIDDING WORK
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
1. Regular and irregular inspection
a) The regular and irregular inspection of
biddings shall be conducted as follows:
- The ministries, the ministerial-level
agencies, the agencies attached to the Government, the State corporations set
up by the Prime Minister shall inspect the biddings organized by their attached
units.
- The provinces and centrally-run cities shall
inspect the biddings organized by districts, provincial towns and equivalent
administrative units under their management.
- The Ministry of Planning and Investment shall
assume the prime responsibility to inspect, together with the concerned
ministries, branches and localities, the biddings organized by ministries,
ministerial-level agencies, agencies attached to the Government, State
corporations set up by the Prime Minister and localities.
b) The contents of regular and irregular
inspection shall focus on matters related to bidding packages already
performed, including:
- The legal procedures;
- The implementation order;
- The bidding results;
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
2. Inspection upon problems and/or complaints
The inspection of matters hit with problems
and/or complaints about biddings of organizations or individuals shall be
carried out at the request of the competent persons. The agencies having the
responsibility to inspect problems and/or complaints about biddings shall be
the agencies which evaluate the bidding results as defined in Table 1 of
Article 53 of the Bidding Regulation.
Chapter II
IMPLEMENTATION EFFECT
This Circular takes effect for implementation 15
days after its signing. If any problems arise in the course of implementation,
they should be reported to the Ministry of Planning and Investment for sum-up
and handling based on the coordination with concerned ministries, branches and
management bodies.
MINISTER OF PLANNING
AND INVESTMENT
Tran Xuan Gia
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
A NUMBER OF EXAMPLES
Example 1. The bidding plan on brewery A project
I. LEGAL BASES FOR ELABORATION OF THE BIDDING
PLAN
The feasibility study report and the project
investment decision approved by the competent person with the following major
contents:
- The project’s
name: Brewery A.
- Investor: Company B (of province C).
- Designed capacity: 50 million liters/year.
- Total investment: 450 billion VND.
Of which, for construction and installation: 60
billion VND.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Other expenses: 20 billion VND.
- Capital source: The State’s credit investment capital.
- Implementation time: 2 years.
II. ELABORATION OF THE BIDDING PLAN.
1. The work volume already performed: 0.8
billion VND:
- Survey consultancy, elaboration of
pre-feasibility study report and feasibility study report: The implementation
unit is Design Survey Company M appointed for the bidding by decision of the
People’s Committee of
province C (Dispatch No...
on... month... year) with the value of 0.8 billion VND for the performance of a
package contract with the implementation duration of 6 months.
1. The work volume not opened to bidding: 17.2
billion VND
- Ground clearance: 3.0
- Compensation to land used for construction of
transit warehouses: 2.0
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
- Expense for the project management: 2.0
- Working capital: 4.0
- Reserve: 3.2
3. The work volume expected to be opened to
bidding (bidding plan): 432.0 billion VND
The detailed contents of the bidding plan is
demonstrated in Table 1 enclosed herewith.
a) Reasons for bidding package division:
- For consultancy: divided into 1 bidding
package (besides the bidding package already performed). As its value is not
large, it is not separated into two packages of designing and supervision.
- For equipment: The factory’s equipment consist of equipment
in complete sets and equipment in single unit, which are separated into two
packages for bidding.
- Equipment installation: This can be done at
home; hence, it is separated to form a package for domestic bidding.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The price of each bidding package is based on
the total investment structure in the approved feasibility study report and
investment decision. The financial sources for the bidding packages: The State’s credit investment capital
(under the investment decision).
b) The reasons for application of form of
selecting bidders and the bidding mode:
Except for the package on equipment in complete
set which need to be imported to which the international bidding restricted to
a number of countries (suitable to the orientation stated in the feasibility
study report and the investment decision) shall apply, other bidding packages
shall comply with form of unrestricted domestic bidding as prescribed. For the
consultancy bidding package, the two dossier- bag bidding mode shall apply. For
other bidding package, the one dossier-bag bidding mode shall apply as
prescribed.
c) Type of contract:
As all bidding packages have no peculiarity, the
package contracts shall apply as prescribed.
TABLE 1. THE
BREWERY A PROJECT BIDDING PLAN
Bidding
packages’ name
Bidding
packages’ price (billion
VND)
Bidder-
selecting form
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Time for
bidding organization
Type of
contract
Contract
performance duration
Financial
source
Package 1: Construction design and supervision
2.0
Domestic, unrestricted
2 dossier bags
3 months (from…
to…)
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
18 months (from…
to…)
The State credit
Package 2: Equipment in complete set
350.0
International, restricted
1 dossier bag
6 months (from…
to..)
Package
12 months (from…
to…)
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Package 3: Equipment in single units
20.0
Domestic, unrestricted
1 dossier bag
3 months (from…
to…)
Package
9 months (from…
to…)
The State credit
Package 4: Equipment installation
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Domestic, unrestricted
1 dossier bag
3 months
Package
6 months (from..
to…)
The State credit
Package 5: Construction
55.0
Domestic, unrestricted
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
5 months (from…
to…)
Package
12 months (from…
to…)
The State credit
Total
432.0
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Example 2. Evaluation of bids for the equipment
supply bidding package for the 220kV transformer station
I. OUTLINE OF THE BIDDING PACKAGE
The contents of the bidding package:
a) Supply of equipment for one 220 KV
transformer station, including:
- 2 transformers of 250 MVA- 220/110 KV and
- 2 transformers of 40 MVA- 110/22 KV (including
accompanied auxiliary components).
b) The price of the bidding package in the
approved bidding plan: 17.4 million USD. The capital source: The State’s credit loans
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
The bid solicitor has organized bidding
according to regulation. 5 bidders participated therein with the bid prices as
follows:
The bidders’ name
The bid price
(million USD)
A
11.90
B
15.00
C
15.40
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
15.70
E
16.10
II. BID EVALUATION
1. Preliminary evaluation
The preliminary evaluation is made through the examination
of the bids’ validity as
well as their basic satisfaction of the requirements stated in the bidding
dossiers. Through the preliminary evaluation, all 5 bidders met the conditions.
2. Detailed evaluation
a) Step 1: Technical evaluation to make selection
for the short list
Based on the evaluation requirements and
criteria specified in the bidding dossiers and the detailed evaluation criteria
already approved, the bid solicitor shall conduct the technical evaluation of 5
bids through points giving on the basis of the contents on technical
requirements (quality, quantity, technical properties...), contractual terms,
implementation time.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Bidder’s name
Points (maximum
number of points: 100)
A
68.90
B
82.00
C
81.40
D
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
E
67.10
Three bidders B, C and D scored over 70% of the
total points (the minimum point level in the approved evaluation criteria); hence,
they are selected into the short list and entitled to further evaluation in the
next stage.
b) Step 2: Financial and commercial
evaluation and determination of the evaluation prices offered by bidders on the
short list
- Error correction: All the three bids have no
errors to be corrected
- Adjustment of disparities: Bidder D fully
offers the scope of supply as required by the bidding dossiers. Bidders B and C
make insufficient offers lacking a number of auxiliary components as compared
to the requirements of the bidding dossiers. The value of adjustment due to the
insufficient offer made by Bidder B is 0.2 million USD (the disparity against
the bid price represents 1.33%) and of Bidder C is 0.6 million USD (the
disparity against the bid price represents 3.84%). The total disparity of two
bids of B and C does not exceed 10% of the bid price (the level prescribed by
the Bidding Regulation), so these two bids are entitled to further
consideration.
- The conversion of bid price into a common
currency: As all bidders make their offers in USD, such conversion is not
required.
- Bringing things to the same floor for
comparison: The factors on use duration, equipment capacity, manufacturing
technologies�of the offered
equipment are evaluated as being equivalent. Particularly for the operation
expense reflected through the loss of transformer, loss sees the disparity
between the offered equipment of bidders. According to the evaluation criteria
stated in the bidding dossiers and the detailed evaluation criteria already
approved, the transformer loss is calculated according to the following
formula:
T = 4125 x KT + 912 x (CT + P)
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
- T: The value of the transformer loss in 30
years (USD)
- KT: Non-charge loss (steel hub)
- CT: Charge loss (copper wire) at constant
maximum capacity
- P: Subsidiary losses due to wind engine or oil
engine
- Figure 4125 and 912 are fixed value
(calculation unit USD/KW).
The value of KT, CT, C losses is the value
offered by bidders (KW).
With the above calculation, the value of
transformer loss incurred by the bidders shall be as follows:
B: 6.0 million USD
C: 6.2 million USD
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
- Determination of evaluation price:
Summing up all the above parts, the bidders’ evaluation prices shall be as
follows:
Unit: Million USD
Bidder B
Bidder C
Bidder D
1. Bid price
15.00
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
15.70
2. Error correction
-
-
-
3. Disparity adjustment
+0.20
+0.60
-
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
+6.00
+6.20
+ 5.20
5. Evaluation price (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)
21.20
22.20
20.90
Ranking
2
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
1
According to the results shown in the above
table, Bidder D has the lowest "evaluation price" (20.9 million USD),
thus ranking first and being recommended as the bid winning unit with the
"proposed bid winning price" (the bid price after the error
correction and disparity adjustment) being 15.7 million USD.
Example 3. Evaluation of bids for small-sized
construction bidding packages
I. OUTLINE OF THE BIDDING PACKAGE
The contents of the bidding package:
a) Scope of work: The construction of the main
workshop of Factory M.
b) The price of the bidding package in the
approved bidding plan: 1.8 billion VND
c) Capital source: The State’s credit loan
The bid solicitor organized the bidding as
prescribed. There are 5 bidders participating therein with the following bid
prices:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Bid price
(billion VND)
A
1.70
B
1.65
C
1.75
D
1.72
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
1.68
II. BID EVALUATION
1 Preliminary evaluation
The preliminary evaluation is made through the
examination of the bids’
administrative and legal validity as well as their satisfaction of the
requirements of the bidding dossiers. Through the preliminary evaluation, all 5
bidders meet the requirements
2. Detailed evaluation
a) Step 1: Technical evaluation to select
bidders for the short list
Based on the evaluation requirements and
criteria specified in the bidding dossiers for determination of the short list
of bids which satisfy the technical requirements stated in the bidding
dossiers.
The results of the technical evaluation are as
follows:
Criteria
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
A
B
C
D
E
1. Technical solutions, construction methods
Pass
Pass
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Pass
Fail
2. Implementation tempo
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
Pass
General
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Pass
Fail
Pass
Fail
As results, three bidders A, B and D satisfy the
technical requirements and are selected into the short list for Step 2
evaluation.
b) Step 2: Price comparison
+ Error correction:
- Bidder B’s
bid contains arithmetic error due to wrong multiplication of the unit price by
the volume. As result, the error is corrected by adding 20 million VND. Bidder B’s arithmetic error represents
1.2% of the bid price, being lower than the level prescribed in the Bidding
Regulation (15%), hence, after the correction of such arithmetic error, B is
entitled to further consideration.
- No arithmetic errors are found in Bidders A
and D’s bids.
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
- Bidders A and B sufficiently offer all items
as required by the bidding dossier.
- Bidder D makes the insufficient offer, of one
item with the adjustment value of + 70 million VND being added and makes the
superfluous offer of one item with the value of - 20 million VND.
The total adjustment value calculated into the
comparative price is
+ 70 million VND - 20 million VND = + 50 million
VND
The total disparity value calculated with
considering the elimination of bids (calculated according to the absolute value
of disparities) is:
70 million VND + 20 million VND = 90 million
VND.
This total disparity value (90 million VND)
against the bid price (1,750 million VND) represents 5.14%, being lower than
the level prescribed in the Bidding Regulation (10%); hence the bids are
entitled to further consideration.
+ Price comparison:
In order to compare bids of bidders, the bid
prices are adjusted through the following table:
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
Bidder A
Bidder B
Bidder D
1. Bid price
1,700
1,650
1,750
2. Error correction
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
+20
-
3. Disparity adjustment
- Insufficient offer
- Superfluous offer
-
-
-
-
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
- 20
4. Comparison price (1+2+3)
1,700
1,670
1,800
Ranking
2
1
3
...
...
...
Please sign up or sign in to your Pro Membership to see English documents.
THE MINISTRY OF PLANNING AND INVESTMENT
Tran Xuan Gia